Simple 1-2-3 Scoring pigeons
Published in NBRC Bulletin Sep-Oct 1991
The cross-fire of rule proposals for the 1991 International Fly produced a number of thoughtful and innovative ideas for scoring kit competitions. This is an important topic since the scoring system has a strong influence on the type of kits flown. I think one should strive for quality concert action involving as much of the kit as possible. These performances should be deep and often. If you share this ideal, let me recommend the following scoring system which rewards it while still encouraging beginners to get involved.
This scheme evolved from
ideas originated by Monty Niebel and modified by several others including
Brent Martindale. Scoring is based on a 20-bird
kit with points awarded as follows: 5-9 birds performing adequately together
(quarter turn) get 1 point per bird, 10-14 (half turn) receive 2 pts
each, 15-19 (3/4 turn) get 3 pts each, and all 20 (full turn) receives
As few as 15 birds may be flown, but the above scoring would still be
used. The judge simply estimates the number of adequate birds involved
turn and later converts the score. Adequate performances are defined
as those exhibiting sufficient quality and depth to be included.
is for Rollers and not tumblers. We tried this during the 1990 Fall series
of Idaho Roller Club flies and it worked fine. Here’s a summary
of the system.
Note how this “nonlinear” scoring system favors the larger turns. For example, it would take 3 “half-turns” of 10 birds to beat a single quality performance from 19-birds.
Another interesting concept is the use of multiplying quality and depth factors which vary from 1.0 for “adequate” to 2.0 for “phenomenal” with all intermediate values allowed. That is, simply take the above raw score based upon the turns of adequate Rollers and multiplying it by a factor of 1.0 to 2.0 according to the judge’s estimate of average overall quality of the kit. Next, multiply the results by 1.0 to 2.0 according to the judge’s average overall estimate of depth or duration of the turns. This is a logical extension of the traditional awarding of “double points” for exceptionally deep turns. It would be highly unusual that either of these factors would exceed 1.5. This approach gives the judge flexibility in rewarding “more than adequate” performance and allows the “best kit” to win.
A final innovation is the use of “flex-time” for the fly which would range from 15-20 minutes. This means that any birds landing after 15 minutes would terminate scoring, but it would continue for up to 20 minutes otherwise. Birds down before 15 minutes would disqualify the kit. This technique favors the traditional 20 minutes but is not so rigid.
I think these ideas are good and encourage you to try any or all of them. The goal is to reward the highest degree of success without completely discouraging newcomers. Please let me know if you find anything better.
|Bird Breeders, Buy/Sell Birds, birds, pigeon, pigeons, pigeon food, pigeon health, pigeon products, performing pigeons, fancy pigeons, bird food, bird cage, bird health, pigeon breeder, bird egg, egg, pigeon trap, pigeon magazine, pigeon news, pet pigeons, pigeon show, poultry, bird products, pigeon products, pigeon medicine, pigeon supply, pigeon|
|Back to Pigeon Articles Page|
Home -- My Pigeons -- Pigeon Search -- Baby Pigeons -- Basic Needs -- Guest Book -- Pictures -- Pigeon Breeds
Links -- Genetics -- Breeders -- Articles
-- LITERATURE CITED --
|Copyright © 2007-2018 Mumtaztic Loft. All rights reserved.|