|
||||
Possible
Jumping Genes In Pigeons
The history of inherited traits (gene concept) started with Gregor Mendel (1865-1910). Through his work with pea plants, Mendel discovered the fundamental laws of inheritance. In 1909 a Belgian Professor Frans Alfons Janssens of the University of Leuven described a phenomenon and called it "chiasmatypie". The term chiasma is thought to be what we now know as the chromosomal crossover. At that time, we knew genes were located on chromosomes, like beads on a string. Genes occupy certain "loci" on the chromosomes and are sometimes so closely linked together that they tend to "go together" in a common gamete. Thereby alleles at different loci that are closely linked sort in a dependent fashion, not necessarily independently, as Mendel assumed. Alleles of different genes ("loci") that are on different chromosomes or widely separated on the same chromosome sort independently, as Mendel assumed. In 1913 Thomas Hunt Morgan first described, in theory, crossing over of genes. When Morgan discovered the first Drosophila gene, he immediately saw the great importance of Janssens' cytological interpretation of chiasmata to the experimental results of his research on the heredity of Drosophila. Morgan was the founder of Drosophila genetics, and in his honor a recombination map unit is called a centiMorgan (cM). A map unit, or centiMorgan, is equal to crossing over between two genes in 1% of the gametes. Although crossing over of genes was first described by Morgan, the physical basis of crossing over was first demonstrated by Harriet Creighton and Barbara McClintock in 1931. McClintock produced the first genetic map for maize, linking regions of the chromosome to physical traits. She demonstrated the role of the telomere and centromere, regions of the chromosome that are important in the conservation of genetic information. The Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Dr. McClintock in 1983 for the discovery of genetic transposition. She is the only woman to receive an unshared Nobel Prize in that category. Since her discoveries, geneticists have been learning a lot more about DNA and how jumping genes affect the expression of genes. Until McClintock’s discoveries, genes were seen as inviolate objects with fixed positions (loci) on the chromosomes. We now know there are some genes (transposons) which do not have fixed positions in the genome and therefore can be removed from any cell; thus, all the progeny cells are back to their normal functions. In her observations of the chromosomal abnormalities, she noticed there were chromosome fragments left over from broken chromosomes. She figured out that what is known as the “ring” chromosomes were actually chromosomal fragments whose ends fused to form a ring structure. When she tracked the inheritance of these rings through mitosis, she found that they can be lost. McClintock concluded that different populations of corn cells can express different genes depending on when they keep or lose the ring chromosomes.
McClintock's study was a landmark in at least two directions: It showed that one gene can mutate another, and it illustrated that the genetic map with genes along a chromosome were capable of being changed by the action of another gene. McClintock noted unusual color patterns in the leaves of maize plants as they began to grow. She hypothesized that during cell division, certain cells lost genetic material, while others gained what they had lost. However, when comparing the chromosomes of the current generation of plants and their parent's generation, she found certain parts of the chromosomes had switched positions on the chromosome. McClintock's remarkable discovery, based entirely on her observation of chromosomes and genetic crosses at that time, had to wait for confirmation when we had the technology to sequence genomes. Class I and Class II TEs can be either autonomous or nonautonomous. Autonomous TEs can move on their own, while nonautonomous elements require other TEs presence in order to move. This is because nonautonomous elements lack the gene for the transposase or reverse transcriptase needed for their transposition, so they must "borrow" these proteins from another element in order to move (Pray, 2008).
Today, scientists know that there are many different types of TEs, as well as a number of ways to categorize them. We now know that what McClintock had found in corn is also found in many plants and animals from algae to human beings. In fact, TEs make up approximately 50% of the human genome and up to 90% of the maize genome (SanMiguel, 1996). Although we are discovering that Transposon Elements are found in most life forms, we do not know how or when genes started to jump around the chromosomes. They may have originated from a common ancestor, or arisen independently multiple times, or arisen once and then spread to other kingdoms by horizontal gene transfer. What we do know is that while some TEs confer benefits to their host, most are regarded as selfish DNA parasites - similar to viruses. Because excessive TE activity can damage exons (active gene sequences), many organisms have developed mechanisms inhibiting their activities. Various viruses and TEs also share features in their genome structures and biochemical abilities leading to speculation that they share a common ancestor. Thus, it seems that over the course of evolution DNA transposons were deactivated, leaving them as introns (inactive gene sequences). A mutation is a change in the genetic makeup of a living organism, and this change can either be beneficial or detrimental to the living organism. The main benefit of mutation is essentially survival; living organisms are currently alive due to successful mutations through natural selection. Crossover of genes occurs when two chromosomes, normally two homologous instances of the same chromosome, break and then reconnect but to the different end pieces. If they break at slightly different loci, the result can be a duplication of genes on one chromosome and a deletion of them on the other. Thus, crossover mechanism allows mutations to be linked on the same chromosome. Without the crossover, each gamete (sperm or egg) would get exact set of either paternal or maternal chromosomes. In other words, without crossover, all alleles for those genes linked together on the same chromosome would be inherited together. Thereby, the result of a crossover allows an equal amount of DNA material between pairs of chromosomes to be swapped from one chromosome to the other without changing overall sizes of each chromosome. The consequence of crossover is that the new chromosome may be superior to either of the parents if it takes the best characteristics (desirable traits) from each of the parents. It could also allow undesirable traits to be combined together. At any rate, without the mutation and crossover there cannot be evolution. But what role did transposons play over the course evolution?
For years jumping genes were basically ignored and considered “parasitic” or “junk” DNA. Now, they are being viewed as, perhaps, the most important mechanism of evolution. Plants appear to have the most jumping genes, with some genomes many times larger than humans with millions of self copied DNA elements. Corn has 40,000 genes, twice that of humans and 85% of their DNA is TEs. Since plants do not have as many behavioral responses as animals, it is possible they need more jumping genes to create evolutionary change in response to stress. At her Nobel Prize lecture, Dr. McClintock emphasized that transposition can provide a means to rapidly reorganize the genome in response to environmental stress. In this sense, mutations produced by transposition could be a source of variation driving the process of evolution. Transposons establish a hereditary relationship between two organisms from different species. Thus, by looking at the common transposon insertions, we can tell if different species share a common ancestry. The fact that transposable elements do not always excise perfectly and can take genomic sequences along for the ride has also resulted in a phenomenon scientists call exon shuffling. Exon shuffling results in the juxtaposition of two previously unrelated exons, usually by transposition, thereby potentially creating novel gene products (Moran et al., 1999). It seems we have barely scratched the surface of transposons, but one thing is certain: DNA transposons have the potential to influence the evolutionary trajectory of their hosts. The genome is a pretty big sequence, so there are lots of places a transposon could reinsert. Sometimes a transposon will reinsert at another non-coding region leaving them as introns; this is usually what happens, since there’s so much more non-coding DNA than there is coding DNA. But sometimes a transposon can reinsert in a coding region and disrupt a gene which normally causes a debilitating mutation or disease. Consequently, we can argue that the transposon is as a separate selective entity to its host genome -- almost like a DNA parasite -- causing mostly non-beneficial mutations. Transposons also play a role in epigenetics by randomly turning the gene function on or off via alterations of gene function through insertion. However, there are also benefits which come from having transposons in a genome. Because transposon sequences occur randomly in different places in the genome, transposons offer an excellent way to identify individuals genetically. This becomes very relevant when DNA fingerprinting technology is used to establish paternity using a genetic test. These tests take advantage of the fact that two individuals in a population having the transposon sequences in the exact same location is extremely rare, so much so that we can conclude genetic relation based on similar patterns of genomic transposons.
Since we are learning that all living organisms (both prokaryotes and eukaryotes) also have these transposable elements (TE's) in their DNA, we in the pigeon genetics community need to get familiar with this extraordinary phenomenon more popularly known as the “jumping genes” and add these words to our pigeon genetics lexicon. Attacking the genetic problems at the biochemical level after the Hollander Era has already started to pay off for pigeon genetics. With the start of the Genomic Era in pigeon genetics, results found in laboratory test tubes are already proving to be much more accurate than conventional Mendelian results. Biochemistry has allowed us to approach the genetic problems at the molecular level and, because the general plan of the macromolecules involved is rather simple, it has been remarkably successful. Nowadays, scientists look at both DNA sequencing data and biochemistry data, which are far more convincing than breeding data. Evidently, molecular genetics compliments the classical genetics (breeding data), but we are only at the beginning of discovering more accurate data from the sequencing of genes. Therefore, molecular geneticists at times find genotype data to be quite ugly as well. Yet, because of these exciting studies, we will soon be able to know which phenotypes are produced by the jumping genes when looking at the sequencing of a pigeon genome. Although not widely accepted at the time of its discovery, Dr. McClintock's observation of the behavior of kernel color alleles was revolutionary in its proposition that genomic replication does not always follow a consistent pattern. Hence, at this point, it should be reasonable to guess which phenotypes in pigeons possibly result from transposons. My first reaction when I studied the jumping genes and saw the corn examples produced by this phenomenon was almond and grizzle phenotypes in pigeons. It is a pure guess on my part at this point to suggest that transposons may be the root cause of almond, grizzle, and their alleles. Although we do not yet have sequencing data available for neither of these genes, the idea certainly seems to be consistent with the observed phenotypes.
According to Dr. Smith, the transposable element may even code for the protein that does the moving. Further, it can have several copies of the transposable element in a row. Thus, it is not unreasonable to hypothesize that an allelic series like almond is caused by this phenomenon. The flecks causing various variegation of brown, black, and white in the almond series and the solid colored, or pure white, or mixed textured streaks in various grizzle phenotypes suggest a similarity to the transposons affect in corn. Although we have several hundred pigment genes in pigeons, it only takes one or two to be disrupted by a transposon to get almond or grizzle phenotypes. The other alleles of these mutants could easily be multiple copy issues of the original transposon or they could be something entirely different (private communication). Although corn is indigenous to the western hemisphere, its exact birthplace is far less certain. Archeological evidence suggests that it was first found in Mexico. The original wild form has long been extinct but according to current studies, transposons make up 85% of the domesticated corn genome. Therefore, transposons may account for the rapid evolution of the tiny hard-kerneled teosinte form grown thousands of years ago in Mexico, to multi-colored Indian corn, and the larger and sweeter varieties popular today. Similar to dogs and domestic pigeons, corn has been rigorously selected over thousands of years and undergone incredible changes. Thus, it would not be perverse to theorize that transposable elements may also help to explain how the Rock pigeon genome can give rise to a variety of domestic pigeon breeds today. It might seem extreme and unjustified, but because of its performance variety (depth, velocity, frequency, style, and control), the rolling trait in Roller Pigeons might be due to transposons and/or other epigenetics. I for one, cannot wait to see the sequencing results of the roll gene(s). We certainly live in a very exciting time for new discoveries with the help of new technology. It is equally exciting to have scientists who have found pigeons to be once again the choice of species when experimenting with molecular genetics.
References: 1. Creighton H, McClintock B.
A Correlation of Cytological and Genetical Crossing-Over in Zea Mays.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 17 (8): 492–7 (1931). Copyright February, 2014 by Arif Mümtaz. |
||||
Bird Breeders, Buy/Sell Birds, birds, pigeon, pigeons, pigeon food, pigeon health, pigeon products, performing pigeons, fancy pigeons, bird food, bird cage, bird health, pigeon breeder, bird egg, egg, pigeon trap, pigeon magazine, pigeon news, pet pigeons, pigeon show, poultry, bird products, pigeon products, pigeon medicine, pigeon supply, pigeon | ||||
Back to Pigeon Articles Page | ||||
Home -- My Pigeons -- Pigeon Search -- Baby Pigeons -- Basic Needs -- Guest Book -- Pictures -- Pigeon Breeds Links -- Genetics -- Breeders -- Articles -- LITERATURE CITED -- |
Copyright © 2007-2019 Mumtaztic Loft. All rights reserved. |